This week, the new Ken Burns and Dayton Duncan documentary, “The National Parks: America’s Best Idea,” is premiering on PBS. I had the good fortune to catch a few sneak previews of the six-part series, and I’m eager to see the rest.
I was struck by how the filmmakers tied the history of the national parks to our political, social and individual identities as Americans. This excerpt from the introduction on their Web site gets at some of these ideas:
For Dayton Duncan and Ken Burns, this idea is fundamental to our democratic spirit, and for them, understanding the role of the parks in the history of America is key to understanding ourselves.
It’s fitting, then, that this documentary – which captures the uniquely American idea of public lands for all people -- is premiering on America’s public television network, PBS. Just as our national parks are an articulation of democratic ideals, public broadcasting has sought to serve the democratic needs of our nation. Free Press has argued that, “The ideals of public broadcasting are deeply rooted in the principles of American democracy.”
The founding vision of public media was as a “noncommercial, nonprofit and independent enterprise for providing the news, educational and children’s programming that enriches and informs a democratic citizenry, and it would provide the ‘public interest’ programming that [is] notably absent from commercial broadcasting.”
In the same way we have sought to preserve America’s most special places as National Parks for all people, we have also sought to set aside a place in our media that serves all of us as well. Where National Parks were designed to provide an escape from the increasingly urbanized and industrialized society, public broadcasting has been designed as a respite from the commercialized mainstream media.
This documentary comes at a moment of profound change in both our environment and our media. While both are core to our democratic identity, both have suffered from neglect, inadequate funding, and bad policy decisions. Our national parks are facing enormous challenges related to climate change, pollution and sprawl at the same time that budget cuts have left fewer staff managing more and more land and bad policies have hamstrung conservation efforts. The challenges facing our media are no less daunting. Decades of media consolidation (a result of bad policies) have gutted newsrooms, and as more vital news and information is shifting online, still more than 40% of America is on the wrong side of the digital divide.
So what can this documentary, which sits at the intersection of media and conservation, tell us about how to respond to the challenges facing both?
In an interview about the film, Duncan wrote that “the greatest lesson I learned in making this film is this reaffirming lesson of democracy… I believe in democracy and what I wasn’t prepared for were the great lessons of politics and democracy and citizen activism that are at the heart of the park story – the determination that these places are not only there for us, but for all people to enjoy. And also that all people can have a role in making sure that there are places for all of us to enjoy. It doesn’t happen by itself and it sometimes happens with the help of powerful interests, but most often it was everyday people who changed the course of American history by deciding that a special portion of this great landscape was now going to be sacred and going to be preserved forever.”
Just as citizens were at the heart of protecting many of the national parks initially, citizen service and activism continues to be at the heart this work. Dale Penny, president of the Student Conservation Association, which places thousands of “citizen stewards” in national parks each year, wrote of the new documentary, “If all we do is watch, we will not be doing enough.” He calls on people to see the new documentary not just as a history of our national parks, but also as a call to action for the future of all our public lands.
We would be well served to do the same for our public airwaves. The environmental movement has been particularly good at moving people to action. It has built legions of citizen activists across the country and committed advocates on Capitol Hill. People have come to understand the environment as both a local issue, demanding local action, and a political issue, demanding policy solutions. We are just beginning to see such an understanding of the media – especially public and community media.
In Free Press’s report, “Public Media’s Moment,” we argue that now is the time for policy makers and the nation to reimagine our public media system. This reimagining involves much more than just another fight for more appropriations in Congress. The upheaval in media brought about by the Internet and digital technologies, media consolidation and a global economic crisis, offers us a unique moment to lay the groundwork for a new kind of public media, one that competes side by side with commercial media and that meets the diverse information needs of the American people.
However, if we are to set up a public media system that is as grand and long-lasting as our national parks, we can’t leave it up to lawmakers and pundits. If we value the kind of documentaries, journalism, educational programming, arts, music and government and community access that exists almost exclusively on public media, we can’t just write checks to our local PBS and NPR stations. We need policies that will preserve our public media just as we’ve preserved our parks.
I'm assuming that when Josh
I'm assuming that when Josh mentions "community access" in his excellent blog, he means PEG Access/Community Media Centers? Especially since those of us in the ACM have always understood our local PEG Access Centers are regional Parkland and local Public Park Space.
The license/franchise negotiated by the Local Franchising Authority with Providers for the use of the Public Rights of Way in exchange for franchise and PEG Access fees that fund the provision of local community communications resources including a management entity, training in productions, tools for the creation of content and the transmission of that programming content to the local community, is just like these Forums, Space and Place for Community Communication. Isn't that like Communing with our Human Nature?
Post new comment